Commit 41c7ca82 authored by Kir Kolyshkin's avatar Kir Kolyshkin Committed by Pavel Emelyanov

Fix typos in comments

This is less useful than fixing typos in output messages, but anyway.
Signed-off-by: 's avatarKir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: 's avatarPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
parent d90d4b1b
......@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ err:
return ret;
}
/* Map a private vma, if it is not mapped by a parrent yet */
/* Map a private vma, if it is not mapped by a parent yet */
static int map_private_vma(pid_t pid, struct vma_area *vma, void *tgt_addr,
struct vma_area **pvma, struct list_head *pvma_list)
{
......@@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ static int restore_task_with_children(void *_arg)
}
/*
* The block mask will be restored in sigresturn.
* The block mask will be restored in sigreturn.
*
* TODO: This code should be removed, when a freezer will be added.
*/
......@@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ static int sigreturn_restore(pid_t pid, CoreEntry *core)
ret = open_signal_image(CR_FD_SIGNAL, pid, &siginfo_chunk,
&siginfo_size, &siginfo_nr);
if (ret < 0) {
if (errno != ENOENT) /* backward compatiblity */
if (errno != ENOENT) /* backward compatibility */
goto err;
ret = 0;
}
......@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ static int sigreturn_restore(pid_t pid, CoreEntry *core)
current->threads[i].virt, &siginfo_chunk,
&siginfo_size, &siginfo_nr);
if (ret < 0) {
if (errno != ENOENT) /* backward compatiblity */
if (errno != ENOENT) /* backward compatibility */
goto err;
ret = 0;
}
......@@ -2075,8 +2075,8 @@ static int sigreturn_restore(pid_t pid, CoreEntry *core)
task_args->thread_args);
/*
* An indirect call to task_restore, note it never resturns
* and restoreing core is extremely destructive.
* An indirect call to task_restore, note it never returns
* and restoring core is extremely destructive.
*/
JUMP_TO_RESTORER_BLOB(new_sp, restore_task_exec_start, task_args);
......
......@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct eventfd_file_info {
struct file_desc d;
};
/* Checks if file desciptor @lfd is eventfd */
/* Checks if file descriptor @lfd is eventfd */
int is_eventfd_link(int lfd)
{
return is_anon_link_type(lfd, "[eventfd]");
......
......@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct eventpoll_tfd_file_info {
static LIST_HEAD(eventpoll_tfds);
/* Checks if file desciptor @lfd is eventfd */
/* Checks if file descriptor @lfd is eventfd */
int is_eventpoll_link(int lfd)
{
return is_anon_link_type(lfd, "[eventpoll]");
......
......@@ -19,11 +19,11 @@
/*
* FIFO checkpoint and restore is done in a bit unusual manner.
* We use files-reg.c engine to save fifo path and flags,
* thus regular files image will contain fifo descriptos which
* thus regular files image will contain fifo descriptors which
* are useless for reg-files engine itself but needed for our fifo
* engine.
*
* In particual we dump fifo-entry automatically and appropriate
* In particular we dump fifo-entry automatically and appropriate
* reg-file entry manually, thus on restore we need to ask reg-file
* engine to restore fifo path and flags via direct call.
*/
......
......@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ struct fsnotify_file_info {
static LIST_HEAD(inotify_info_head);
static LIST_HEAD(fanotify_info_head);
/* Checks if file desciptor @lfd is inotify */
/* Checks if file descriptor @lfd is inotify */
int is_inotify_link(int lfd)
{
return is_anon_link_type(lfd, "inotify");
}
/* Checks if file desciptor @lfd is fanotify */
/* Checks if file descriptor @lfd is fanotify */
int is_fanotify_link(int lfd)
{
return is_anon_link_type(lfd, "[fanotify]");
......
......@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static unsigned int get_ns_id(int pid, struct ns_desc *nd)
return 0;
}
/* XXX: Does it make sence to validate kernel links to <name>:[<id>]? */
/* XXX: Does it make sense to validate kernel links to <name>:[<id>]? */
kid = strtoul(ns_id + strlen(nd->str) + 2, &end, 10);
return generate_ns_id(pid, kid, nd);
}
......@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ int dump_namespaces(struct pid *ns_pid, unsigned int ns_flags)
* parallel with task dumping routine.
*
* However, the question how to dump sockets from the target
* net namesapce with this is still open
* net namespace with this is still open
*/
pr_info("Dumping %d(%d)'s namespaces\n", ns_pid->virt, ns_pid->real);
......
......@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static inline int try_add_page_to(struct page_pipe *pp, struct page_pipe_buf *pp
}
if (ppb->nr_segs == UIO_MAXIOV)
/* XXX -- shink pipe back? */
/* XXX -- shrink pipe back? */
return 1;
}
......
......@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ retry_signal:
}
/*
* We've reached this point iif int3 is triggered inside our
* We've reached this point if int3 is triggered inside our
* parasite code. So we're done.
*/
ret = 0;
......
......@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int unseize_task(pid_t pid, int st)
/*
* This routine seizes task putting it into a special
* state where we can manipulate the task via ptrace
* inteface, and finally we can detach ptrace out of
* interface, and finally we can detach ptrace out of
* of it so the task would not know if it was saddled
* up with someone else.
*/
......
......@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ int dump_sk_queue(int sock_fd, int sock_id)
size -= 32;
/*
* Allocate data for a streem.
* Allocate data for a stream.
*/
data = xmalloc(size);
if (!data)
......@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int dump_sk_queue(int sock_fd, int sock_id)
}
if (msg.msg_flags & MSG_TRUNC) {
/*
* DGRAM thuncated. This should not happen. But we have
* DGRAM truncated. This should not happen. But we have
* to check...
*/
pr_err("sys_recvmsg failed: truncated\n");
......@@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ int restore_sk_queue(int fd, unsigned int peer_id)
/*
* Don't try to use sendfile here, because it use sendpage() and
* all data are splitted on pages and a new skb is allocated for
* all data are split on pages and a new skb is allocated for
* each page. It creates a big overhead on SNDBUF.
* sendfile() isn't suatable for DGRAM sockets, because message
* sendfile() isn't suitable for DGRAM sockets, because message
* boundaries messages should be saved.
*/
......
......@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int unix_collect_one(const struct unix_diag_msg *m,
(int)uv->udiag_vfs_ino);
/*
* When a socket is bound to unlinked file, we
* just drop his name, since noone will access
* just drop his name, since no one will access
* it via one.
*/
xfree(name);
......
......@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int restore_tty_params(int fd, struct tty_info *info)
* because it contain @c_cc array which
* is bigger than TERMIOS_NCC. Same applies
* to winsize usage, we can't guarantee the
* structure taked from the system headers will
* structure taken from the system headers will
* never be extended.
*/
......@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int pty_open_unpaired_slave(struct file_desc *d, struct tty_info *slave)
*
* Note, at this point the group/session should
* be already restored properly thus we can simply
* use syscalls intead of lookup via process tree.
* use syscalls instead of lookup via process tree.
*/
if (likely(slave->tie->sid == INHERIT_SID)) {
if (tty_set_prgp(fd, getpgid(getppid())))
......@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int collect_one_tty(void *obj, ProtobufCMessage *msg)
return -1;
/*
* The tty peers which have no @termios are hunged up,
* The tty peers which have no @termios are hung up,
* so don't mark them as active, we create them with
* faked master and they are rather a rudiment which
* can't be used. Most likely they appear if a user has
......@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int dump_pty_info(int lfd, u32 id, const struct fd_parms *p, int major, i
pty.index = index;
/*
* Nothing we can do on hangin up terminal,
* Nothing we can do on hanging up terminal,
* just write out minimum information we can
* gather.
*/
......@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ static int dump_pty_info(int lfd, u32 id, const struct fd_parms *p, int major, i
* the task might have slave peer assigned but no
* master peer. Such "detached" master peers are
* not yet supported by our tool and better to
* inform a user about such situatio,
* inform a user about such situation.
*/
tty_test_and_set(id, tty_active_pairs);
......
......@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ int init_service_fd(void)
struct rlimit rlimit;
/*
* Service FDs are thouse that most likely won't
* Service FDs are those that most likely won't
* conflict with any 'real-life' ones
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment